The "petrodollar agreement" supposedly expired in June 2024—except it never actually existed. Yet something real is dying, and the implications are seismic.

For fifty years, global oil trade operated on a simple premise: if you want oil, you need dollars. This arrangement gave Washington an "exorbitant privilege"—perpetual currency demand, artificially low borrowing costs, and weaponized financial control.

But the architecture is cracking. Saudi Arabia joined China's mBridge digital currency project in June 2024, a blockchain platform designed to bypass the dollar entirely. The kingdom's Treasury holdings swing wildly—$143.9 billion in September 2024, down to $126.4 billion by February, back to $131.7 billion by July. Meanwhile, China imports $63 billion in Saudi oil annually and settles 50% of cross-border trade in yuan.

The narrative that "nothing has changed" is cope. The data tells a different story:

Dollar dominance is eroding:

• Reserve share fell from 72% (2001) to 56.3% (Q2 2025)—a 30-year low

• Yuan SWIFT payments hit 3.89% in November 2024, overtaking the yen

• Roughly 80% of oil still prices in dollars, but "still" is doing heavy lifting

• 
  

The Real System Behind the Fake Agreement

No formal "50-year petrodollar agreement" ever existed. What did exist: Nixon-era diplomacy securing Saudi commitment to dollar-denominated oil in exchange for military protection. The arrangement was always informal, built on mutual interest.

The petrodollar system rests on three pillars:

• Oil priced in dollars

• Transactions settled in dollars

• Oil revenues recycled into U.S. Treasuries

Saudi Arabia executed this playbook faithfully for decades—$143.9 billion in Treasuries as of September 2024, $435 billion in dollar reserves, and a riyal pegged at 3.75:1 since 1986.

Now Riyadh is installing plumbing to bypass it entirely.

Enter mBridge: The SWIFT Killer

Saudi Arabia became a full mBridge participant in June 2024—a multi-CBDC platform using distributed ledger technology for instant cross-border payments. No correspondent banks, no dollar conversion, no SWIFT required.

The capabilities are real:

• Transactions clear in 10 seconds vs. days through traditional banking

• 35 commercial banks processed real-value payments in four digital currencies (Feb-Sept 2024)

• Platform reached minimum viable product status mid-2024

Then came the telling moment: BIS suddenly exited in October 2024 after Putin floated a "BRICS Bridge" concept. Atlantic Council's Josh Lipsky admitted: "If there's even a possibility that mBridge could be helpful to those ambitions the West wants no part of it."

Translation: It works too well, and Washington can't control it.

Why the "Limited Progress" Narrative Is Wrong

Establishment sources like S&P Global claim yuan-oil trade "may take decades to scale." Their arguments: yuan isn't widely used, limited spending outlets exist, and Saudi's dollar peg constrains flexibility.

These arguments fight the last war. The world changed:

Saudi-China economic integration accelerated:

• China now Saudi's largest trading partner—$87.3 billion annually

• Oil comprises 84% of Saudi exports to China, up from 66% a decade ago

• Trade surplus with Beijing ballooned from $5-10B (2015-16) to $20-40B recently

New deployment channels emerged:

• Chinese firms building Saudi infrastructure (Vision 2030 alignment)

• Aramco considering Hong Kong Stock Exchange listing

• First Asia ETF tracking Saudi stocks launched with PIF backing

• Belt and Road yuan financing for diversification projects

The calculus shifted. If China offers yuan infrastructure financing, seamless mBridge settlement, and fewer political strings than IMF/World Bank loans, why maintain dollar exclusivity?

The Network Effect Runs in Reverse

Reserve currency dominance follows network effects—self-reinforcing on the way up, self-reinforcing on the way down.

Yuan internationalization is accelerating:

• SWIFT payments surged from 2.1% (2023) to 3.89% (Nov 2024)

• Trade finance share hit 6%—matching the euro

• Russia-China settle 90% of trade in local currencies

• China's CIPS processes $60-67B daily across 1,530 institutions in 115 countries

Central banks are hedging:

• Gold's reserve share doubled from 10% (2015) to 23% (2024)

• Russia-China added 3,626 tonnes since 2005

• China's 11-month gold buying spree: 2,303 tonnes ($283B)

• Beijing dumped Treasuries 45%: from $1.317T peak to $730.7B (July 2025)

What Happens Next

The petrodollar isn't dying dramatically—it's dying the way the British pound lost reserve status after WWII. Gradually, then suddenly.

Saudi Arabia is building capacity to:

• Price oil sales in yuan via mBridge

• Settle China trade in digital currency

• Recycle petroyuan into Belt and Road investments

• Diversify security partnerships beyond Washington

Meanwhile, hedging both sides: joined BRICS (invited Aug 2023), became SCO dialogue partner (March 2023), signed $6.93B yuan currency swap (Nov 2023).

These moves are incremental, reversible, deniable. That's what makes them dangerous.

Once Saudi Arabia—the largest oil exporter—demonstrates that major crude transactions can settle in yuan without catastrophe, game theory shifts. Other OPEC members will follow. If mBridge offers cheaper, faster settlement than SWIFT, what's the counterargument?

The endgame isn't a dollar-free world. But the dollar falling from 80% of oil trade to 50%, from 56% of reserves to 40%, from 88% of FX transactions to 70% fundamentally changes U.S. ability to set global monetary policy, run persistent deficits at low cost, and weaponize finance for foreign policy.

Network effects cut both ways. The petrodollar didn't die when a fake agreement "expired" in June 2024. But make no mistake—it's dying. The infrastructure is built. The rails are live.

The question isn't whether Saudi Arabia can trade oil in yuan. The question is: why wouldn't they?